In a few places in the new section 2.23.1 in IKEv2bis, it says that one must 
have a trigger packet when starting negotiation. This assumption should be 
removed so as not to cause new requirements in IKEv2bis: there is no 
requirement for trigger packets in RFC 4306 or in the rest of IKEv2bis.

- "When the client starts creating the IKEv2 SA and Child SA for sending 
traffic to the server, it has a triggering packet with source IP address of 
IP1, and a destination IP address of IPN2" should be changed to "...it may have 
a triggering packet...".

- "The first traffic selector of TSi and TSr SHOULD have very specific traffic 
selectors including protocol and port numbers from the packet triggering the 
request" should be changed to "...SHOULD have very specific traffic selectors 
including protocol and port numbers, such as from the packet...".

- The same change is made in the third bullet of the client list near the end 
of the section.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to