At 3:02 PM -0400 3/19/10, Thomas Narten wrote: > > s3.3.4: The draft states that the list of mandatory to implement >> suites has been removed due to evolution going too fast. Is this >> acceptable? > >Put the list in a standalone document that can (in theory) be easily >updated without tying it to other changes in IKEv2?
That's exactly what we did with RFC 4307 and RFC 4308. We haven't updated them, but we could. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
