Hi everyone,
I read Dan's draft and I am OK with holding the working group's
discussion of alternative PAKE solutions based on this draft. In
particular, I am glad that Dan proposes a way for rational analysis of
the related IPR issues.
Given my own involvement as a coauthor of the HUSH (EKE) draft, it will
be Paul who will lead the discussion.
Thanks,
Yaron
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 02:48 -0700, Dan Harkins wrote:
> A new PAKE criteria draft has been posted to the I-D repository at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-harkins-ipsecme-pake-criteria-00.txt
>
> It describes a different approach to selection criteria and considerations
> than that provided by the other similarly-named I-D.
>
> Please take a look and comment.
>
> regards,
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
