Michael Richardson writes: > > >>>>> "Tero" == Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> writes: > Tero> As you point out in your draft there are several allocations > Tero> without any stable reference, and I would suggest we remove > Tero> those. If there is no specification how to implement it, there > Tero> is no way anybody can make interoperable implementations out > Tero> of them either. > > <TCPDUMP HAT ON> > Yes, but at least they can decode what encryption 12345 "was"....
I think the normal practice is to change the removed values to "Reserved (was xxx)", which would be enough for TCPDUMP style uses, but would make it clear that nobody should try to implement them and expect them to be interoperable with someone else... -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
