On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > We have a new charter. Do we have any volunteers to start work on the two > documents we committed to work on?
I think it's premature to start work on the solutions document, but it is time to start work on the problem statement document. I'm willing to work on the problem statement document, but I'd rather not edit, if possible. > Related: we should consider having a face-to-face meeting at the upcoming > IETF in Paris, but only if there is value for the newly-chartered work. In my > mind, that means both a first draft submitted *and* interesting questions > that would benefit from face-to-face discussion instead of just work on the > list. Do people believe we will have that? The problem statement draft should have use cases, definitions, and requirements. These I think benefit greatly from face-to-face discussion, so I think we should have a meeting regardless of whether a first draft is already submitted. In fact this kind of brainstorm meeting can be even better at coming up with definitions than someone making up some definitions and offering them for others to discuss. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
