Valery Smyslov writes: > Just came across one more small editorial issue in RFC5996. > Page 73, description of "Next Payload" field, sentence > > In the header of an Encrypted payload, the Next Payload field is set > to the payload type of the first contained payload (instead of 0); > conversely, the Next Payload field of the last contained payload > is set to zero). > > has extra round bracket at the end.
Removed. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
