I'm not sure what the IETF definition is for "Update an RFC". I would say this RFC only adds to 4306. That is, if you do not implement this document you do not need to know about this "update". I would expect an "updated by" to be mandatory reading material for an implementor of the RFC being updated.
I agree with Paul that the term "update an RFC" is not clear enough and could be treated differently. BTW is there some formal definition of this term (like definitios of uppercase words in RFC2119)? This would clarify the situation.
I'm fine either way, but I am leaning towards not specifying updated by.
I'm also fine with either way. Valery.
Paul
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
