On Mar 30, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for making most of the suggested changes to the draft. I see nothing > happened in section 2.4 with the 'updates' text. Since this requires changes > to the referenced draft, it's easier to just state what is being updated in > the previous RFC with this draft. Could we work on that change and have it > ready soon? I'd rather do this before IETF last call or in IESG review as I > think it pretty clearly should be done. My interpretation from the WG discussion was that there was consensus that this document doesn't need to be marked as "updates RFC 4301". I updated the shepherd report to indicate that the WG defers to the IESG on judgement about this. > The next telechat is April 9th and this won't make it on it, so there is time > to get this update ready without holding up the draft. Unless you want us to make more changes to the draft, you might as well put this into IETF Last Call now, even though it will miss the next telechat. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
