On 18 Feb 2016, at 2:58 PM, Valery Smyslov <sva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I tend to support this idea, but I think in this case the sub-puzzles must be > chained to deal with parallel solving. > Something like the following: > > Puzzle_data[0] = cookie > Puzzle_data[1] = Puzzle_solution[0] | cookie > Puzzle_data[2] = Puzzle_solution[1] | cookie > ... > Puzzle_data[n] = Puzzle_solution[n-1] | cookie > > Or probably someone could suggest more clever construction? I’m not really against this, but is parallel solving really an issue? It does give an advantage to an 8-core desktop or 16-core server over a 2-core laptop. OTOH it might mitigate the power disparity between smartphones and laptops because phones have 4, 6, or 8 cores, while most laptops tend to have 2. Yoav _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
