Hi Watson,
thank you for spending your time on this review in Christmas Eve. The capitalization issue has been already noticed and fixed. I’m not sure the draft should mention NIST levels, because they are relevant mostly for US customers. I think that generic recommendations on key sizes are more appropriate for this document. Regards, Valery. Damn misclick. I meant With Nits. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: Reviewer: Watson Ladd Review result: Not Ready Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time. I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to: It would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic model, ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this explicitly. _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list sec...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
