Éric Vyncke via Datatracker writes: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I found it very > interesting to read BTW. I have only one minor non-blocking comment: > please read RFC 8126 to have a correct IANA section about "type > 16435" (and others). Same applies for section 5.1.
As an IANA expert for those registries, I have no idea why you think the IANA Section for them are not correct. What do you think is wrong with them? The 16435 number has already been allocated from the Status notification registry by IANA, and as far I as understand the IANA section for creating the "IKEv2 Post-quantum Preshared Key ID Types" contains everything that is needed. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
