Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ comments/questions ]] [ section 5 ] * I concur with Eric V. w.r.t. MUST vs SHOULD for dualstack initiators. As written it seems to me like it might be overspecified. * I'm confused about the last entry in the table. If there's a policy restriction to only a single address family, are both IP4 and IP6 _ALLOWED returned? Instead of "4,6" should this be "4|6"? _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
