Hi,

First of all thanks to the WG chairs for the request and Joe for the review. It
is much better to catch things earlier as it is often less disruptiove for the
WG to deal with the feedback at this stage. 

So I don't see any way the reviewer can change their review ones it has been
posted. The datatracker currently only tracks the review, not the resolution of
the review. 

However, as this is an early review and that is directly visible I don't think
this is an issue. Also, it is fairly likely that you will get a new TSVART
review when you do the IETF last call and then you will have review that I guess
will have a Ready. And as Tero says, we ADs follow up our own review team
reviews and check where the discussion went in preparation for balloting. So 
theconcluding discussion resolve the review. 

Cheers

Magnus

On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 22:44 +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Joseph Touch writes:
> > I’m not aware that it’s possible for me to do this. It might be the
> > transport chairs who do.
> 
> That is not normally done during the reviews. If the reviewer is happy
> with the changes authors have done, then thats it. The document will
> get rereviewed during the last call and telechat times also (at least
> in most review teams), and the original reviewer will have option to
> comment it again.
> 
> Area directors usually check the original review, and the reply thread
> for it and then decide whether everything was covered or not...
> 
> Of course every review team has their own way of doing things, and I
> do not know exactly what TSVART does.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to