Here's a summary of the changes based on WGLC WG mailing list discussions and reviews (published in the latest -07 document).
There were 2 minor normative clarifications/changes, clarified the intent that fragmentation should not occur over different SAs, and added a P-bit that is for external use by PLMTUD (it's unused by IP-TFS/AGGFRAG itself). Informative changes included many editorial changes, some organizational cleanup, changing identifiers from IPTFS to AGGFRAG and making the text a bit more generic in this regard. The text on ordering packet reception as well as how extra padding can be used to avoid fragmentation was expanded. A summary section with pointers for the reciever side was added, and finally the overhead calculation was fixed in the appendix comparison data which didn't change the conclusions. Thanks, Chris. P.S. A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-07 > On Jan 24, 2021, at 8:55 PM, Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote: > > This is the start of 3 week WGLC on the document, ending 2021-02-15. > Please submit your comments to the list, also send a note if you have > reviewed the document, so we can see how many people are interested in > getting this out. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
