Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> wrote: >> I wonder about keeping more of the original authors on the new >> document, since it is substantively the same document. I can not >> judge what their contribution was to the original document, nor do I >> know if they were asked. If the design team has gone through this >> consideration, then that's enough for me.
> All three original authors were asked to co-author the draft. Tommy
> agreed, but no reply was received from Samy and Ravi. I cannot judge
> their contribution to the original rfc, but I think that it's a good
> idea to add them to acknowledgement section anyway. Will do this.
Glad to hear you had that discussion. My issue is closed :-)
Please consider using the xml-v3 contributor mechanism.
If you are using Kramdown, then it's just like the author: section, but you
say "contributor:"
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
