On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:05:05AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Tero,
> 
> You said:
> 
> On 11/9/2021 5:11 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > I think there is still bit of tweaking that can be done,
> 
> Is this tweak being made as a blocking comment by the document Shepherd 
> or a non-blocking comment as a contributor?
> 
> If it's a blocking comment -- Sure let's make whatever change you want 
> (as long as long as the rest of the WG can live with the change/doesn't 
> break anything)  so we can get this document out of the WG.

And to follow up, "out of the WG" doesn't mean "done and finalized" --
these are topics that I mostly expect to get more feedback on during the
IETF last call.  So we may want to go forward with what we have and polish
the text with involvement from the broader (e.g., transport) community.

> If as contributor -- can you live with the current text?  It would be 
> great to get the document set to the IESG as discussed this week.

Full disclosure: my queue is a little backed up at the moment, and if I go
in FIFO order it is likely to take a few weeks to clear that.  But that's
not a reason to wait, as there are a couple other documents from other WGs
that are about to enter the queue as well.

-Ben

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to