Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Actually some of those held for document update errata could also be
    > useful to be inlined... Especially for documents which are not yet
    > obsoleted ( RFC2104, RFC4301, RFC4302, and RFC4303).

I think that having stuff inlined is always good.

I read your list, and I agree with them all.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to