Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Chris, Don, This YANG module and document looks good to me. The one discuss issue that I wanted to check on the commented out when statements, e.g., uses ipsec-tx-stat-grouping { //when "direction = 'outbound'"; } Are these when statement meant to just be descriptive? If so, then writing them in plain English is probably better. Or otherwise, can they just be removed from the module, or is there another plan? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In the YANG module, for l2-fixed-rate and l3-fixed-rate, did you consider using yang:gauge64 instead of yang:counter64? This would seem the more natural choice to me. As a minor nit, adding YANG units statements for the counter definitions would probably be helpful, probably copying the usage of units in RFC 8343, e.g., using units "bits/second" instead of "bps", etc. Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
