Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > Murray S. Kucherawy writes: >> This posture worries me. I've no doubt that you're doing a fine job >> as the DE for the registries for which you're responsible, probably >> because you were around during IPSec's development. But what about >> your successor(s)? Will they have all of the context, background, and >> vision you have in order to continue where you eventually leave off?
> Designated experts are called experts, not automation robots following
> steps set in RFCs. My understanding has been that the reason we use
> experts is that then we do not need to give them exact rules to
> follow. Some of the RFCs gives so strict rules for experts to follow,
> that there really is no point of having expert involved at all, IANA
> could simply follow those same steps themselves.
I very very strongly concur with Tero here.
This trend to constraining experts is a problem.
Either we/the IESG trusts the experts, or they don't.
And, either way, if the WG is happy with the instructions, then the let the
WG be.
> We currently have two experts for the IPsec registries (another one was
> added few years back). Also I would assume there is pool of about 5-10
> people in the IETF that could easily work as an expert on the IPsec
> registries on the short notice (whether they would be willing or having
> time is another issue :-)
> On the other hand IPsec registries are easy, as we do have active group
> of people still working on it, meaning we have active mailing list and
> in case there are issues where experts are unsure, the experts can go
> and verify the decisions on the mail list.
Yes... if there is any doubt, the expert can come to the list with questions.
I've seen other experts do this regularly.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
