Yoav Nir <[email protected]> wrote:
    > - also by Valery Inter-domain source address validation using RPKI and
    > IPsec (draft-xu-risav and draft-xu-erisav) - by Yangfei Guo

Based upon conversations on the list, this proposal might not even be IPsec.
At least, it's not proto=50(ESP)/51(AH), as they are asking for a new
extension header type.
The proposal would require allocation of a SPI for a destination address
which is not the receiving system of the SA.
It would be negotiated with IKEv2, but that part seems neither here nor
there.

I don't object to discussing it in IPSECME.
I think it's a good idea to do SOMETHING.
I think that it's very SR6-ish, and since it is cross-AS, I can't see how
6man will approve.

It might be appropriate to at least ask SECDISPATCH.



--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to