On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote:
Since I doubt the working group would have the time and energy to work on two different solutions, my support to this draft's adoption is conditioned to whether the authors plan to consider addressing our concerns listed above.
Speaking with no hats on here: Once the document is adopted, this question is not up to the authors but up to the working group. Putting author hat on: I think this solution is such a small solution and already has running code, that I would prefer the WG to quickly move this on, while also beginning a separate discussion on how to do various different scaling issues (and multi-cpu) in another way, eg by trying to work on an ESPv4 version. But I would be sad if that work, which I expect will take some time, would delay this draft. Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
