On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:00 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> > See > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-5 > > I noticed that the IKEv2 column for AES_GCM variants mentions RFC 8247. > This should be RFC 8221. > And for AES_CCM, the ESP and IKEv2 columns are missing the RFC 8247/8221 > entries entirely. > > It seems that 8221 has no IANA considerations. It should have listed itself with the IKEv2 columns of this registry. It seems that 8247 does have IANA considerations: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8247#section-6 In addition, IANA has added this RFC as a reference to both the ESP Reference and IKEv2 Reference columns for ENCR_AES_GCM entries, while keeping the existing references there. Also, IANA has added this RFC as a reference to the ESP Reference column for ENCR_CAMELLIA_CCM entries, while keeping the existing reference there. The text describes doing the wrong thing, but implies this was already done by IANA? But that might just be the writing style (blame me) and we just told them to do the wrong thing. Paul
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
