Shouldn't the two drafts be merged?
Who of the authors is going to implement the specs?
Ciao
Hannes
@Carsten: I have not been following the ROHC work after standardization
was completed. Was it actually used? Is it still used?
Am 30.11.2023 um 14:09 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
As a co-author of draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp, I do support this work (as well
as the accompanying draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension) and plan to
continue working on it.
We did the equivalent of these two drafts for ROHC in RFC 5856 to 5858.
The current work is an obvious missing link for SCHC that needs to be filled
in, just as we did for ROHC in 2010.
Grüße, Carsten
On 2023-11-27, at 19:33, Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote:
This is two week adoption call for draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp. If you
support adopting this document as a working group document for IPsecME
to work on, and then at some point publish this as an RFC, send
comments to this list.
This adoption call ends 2023-12-13.
Note, that I do want to see people saying that they think this
document is worth of working on, and that they plan to review and
comment on it. If I only get one or two people (including authors :-)
to say they support this work, then there is no point of work on this
in WG.
--
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
