Just in case, this has not been reported earlier, I have the impression WESP should be indicated as an IPv6 Header Extension in [1]. If that is the case we should also add it there in the Header Extension registry in [2]. If we were to do some clean up [1] has a few missing keywords, and keywords from [1] should also be reported in [2] - or [2] completely removed.
Yours, Daniel [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml [2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xml#ipv6-parameters-1 -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
