Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > We have draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping [1] and > draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping [2] both of which propose ESP > ping, but on the different level, and each of those provide different > level of debugging capabilities.
I have read both.
> The question I have for the WG, do we need both?
Yes. The use cases and the target audiences are vastly different.
> If we need both then should we go forward with both of them in
> separate drafts, or combine them to one draft?
Separate drafts.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
