On Mon, 8 Sep 2025, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
The most commonly used “description” for CRQC that I’ve seen is
“Crypto-Relevant Quantum Computer”. Second most-common was
Cryptographically-Relevant.
I agree that Cryptanalytically-Relevant works be the most accurate description.
On Sep 8, 2025, at 13:29, Kampanakis, Panos
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Chris, Thank you. I fixed all of these in the -03 which will be
submitted later
https: //github.
com/csosto-pk/pq-mlkem-ikev2/commit/7bbc0c402dc577e4b93716f373a5ddc040f60c6f .
Note, I kept the “cryptanalytically relevant quantum
computer”,
Thank you. I fixed all of these in the -03 which will be submitted later
https://github.com/csosto-pk/pq-mlkem-ikev2/commit/7bbc0c402dc577e4b93716f373a5ddc040f60c6f
. Note, I kept the “cryptanalytically relevant quantum computer”,
because it is more accurate although “cryptographically …” is more frequently
used.
Note that the PQUIP WG published RFC9794
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9794 which states:
Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer (CRQC)
I strongly recommend to use that term for CRQC instead of "cryptanalytically
relevant quantum computer",
to keep consistency within IETF documents (which is one of the goals of the
PQUIP WG)
Paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
