Thanks, Keagan! Based on this positive feedback, and given that we didn't hear any objections to this change in the meeting (IETF 124), we think this is good to merge. We'll wait until the end of next week in case there is more feedback. https://github.com/smyslov/ikev2-downgrade-prevention/pull/11
Best, Chris P. On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 1:39 PM Keegan Dasilva Barbosa < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I believe the proposed solution is ideal, and the guidance surrounding > session resumption further bolsters the draft's quality. > > Best, > > Keegan Dasilva Barbosa > Canadian Centre for Cyber Security > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 8:09 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As we prepare for IETF 124, there's an open issue for >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-downgrade-prevention I wanted to flag for folks, which >> is how it interacts with session resumption: >> https://github.com/smyslov/ikev2-downgrade-prevention/issues/10 >> >> Valery and I already have an idea of how to resolve this, but we're >> hoping to get some feedback from the WG first: >> https://github.com/smyslov/ikev2-downgrade-prevention/pull/11 >> >> Thanks, >> Chris P. >> _______________________________________________ >> IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
