Greetings, What is the status of the request to present this work to TSVWG?
No significant changes have been made since my comments from March 2025; see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/static/tsvwg/thread/2025/#oMPBLxNa1pipiMKCO2pT77tyr0Y. My contention now, as then, is that the methodology is fundamentally flawed, and I remain in general agreement with Joe Touch's early TSVAREA early review from late October 2022 (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/static/ipsec/thread/2022-10/#FcoOkEB7nG32R2OS_I-jyRgC2). I am, however, willing to listen to counter-arguments from the authors if they present them to TSVWG. For the benefit of those who have yet to read the document, it would be nice if the distracting editorial error that I pointed out last year (s/LTP/TLP/ globally) would be fixed before then. Thanks and regards, Mike Heard On Fri, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:49 AM Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Migault writes: > > > As stated to the microphone at the IPsecme session during IETF 124, our > draft > > > outlines the method for notifying the fragmentation of ESP packets > utilizing > > > IKEv2. > > > > > > As previously recommended by the IPsecme working group, this work should > > > undergo review by the TSVWG. Prior to presenting this work to the TSVWG, > we > > > would like to ascertain if there are any objections to proceeding in this > > > manner. > > > > So if anybody has any objections, please raise them as soon as > > possible, and Daniel if you do not hear anything within week or so, > > you can go ahead. > > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect/ > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Migault > > > Ericsson > > > _______________________________________________ > > > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
