Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth-11: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Many thanks to Eric Vynke for offering to be the responsible AD for this draft, I appreciate it greatly. Also thanks to Russ Housley for their multiple secdir reviews. I only have a couple of comments: Should RFCs 9881 and 9909 be normative? This draft does lean on the work done by those two drafts - OIDs, Security Considerations. RFC 9958 is referenced several times. To make this more obviously an informational reference, I suggest using the phrase 'for example' to make this more obvious. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
