I support adoption.


On Sun, 02 Aug 2026, 00:49 Yoav Nir, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not surprisingly, I support adoption.
>
> There are use cases for large payloads; key-exchange with certain
> algorithms, certificates with extensions, CRLs. Even large Config and
> traffic selector payloads could be used for complex protected domains.
> Allowing payloads to grow beyond the 64K limit removes a constraint from
> people extending IKE. With the growing use of reliable transport, using
> large payloads becomes more practical, so we can expect more of it in the
> future.
>
> Yoav
>
> > On 22 Jul 2026, at 20:56, Tero Kivinen via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > This message starts a ipsecme WG Call for Adoption of:
> > draft-nir-ipsecme-big-payload-07
> >
> > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-08-15
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   The messages of the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) protocol
> >   are made up of payloads.  The current protocol limits each of these
> >   payloads to 64KB by having a 2-byte length field.  While this is
> >   usually enough, several of the payloads may need to be larger.
> >
> >   This document updates RFC 7296 by defining an extension that allows
> >   larger payloads.
> >
> > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support
> adoption
> > of this Internet-Draft by the ipsecme WG. Comments to explain your
> preference
> > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message
> and
> > include this message in your response.
> >
> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions
> > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be
> > found at [3].
> >
> > Thank you.
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-ipsecme-big-payload/
> >
> > There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nir-ipsecme-big-payload-07
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nir-ipsecme-big-payload-07
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to