Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENTs. There is just one non-blocking comment that I am going to leave here, and let you decide how you want to handle it. Paul Wouters’ point on the OPSDIR thread that an implementation supporting only one of ML-DSA/SLH-DSA can't cleanly claim "RFC XXXX supported," and Wang Guilin's suggested fix ("supports ML-DSA [RFC XXXX]"), don't appear to have made it into Section 6 of -12. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
