Hi Hannes, > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-ops-bounces+fred.l.templin=boeing....@lists.cluenet.de > [mailto:ipv6-ops- > bounces+fred.l.templin=boeing....@lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of Hannes > Frederic Sowa > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 1:49 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: Jason Fesler; IPv6 operators forum > Subject: Re: Caching learned MSS/MTU values > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:23:00PM +0000, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > Hi Hannes, > > > > > Oh, that is interesting. I'll have a look at the weekend. > > > > OK. I had to roll another version to make some minor > > changes - see: > > > > http://linkupnetworks.com/seal/sealv2-0.2.tgz > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-templin-intarea-seal-64.txt > > > > I will let it rest for now, so this would be the version to > > start looking at. Let me know if there are any questions or > > comments. > > Do you plan to convert them to git for easier patch management? I would > highly recommend it
Sure - do you have instructions on how to do this? > (it would also be necessary if you strive upstream inclusion). The code is still a long ways off from proposing for upstream inclusion, but I will definitely keep this in mind. > Could you tell me an exact date or commit id where you cloned these > files from? I pulled the tarball from: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-3.10.12.tar.xz and made the edits directly in those files. > Regarding IPv6 PMTU issues: it seems we had some rather broken behaviour > in linux for some time. In some cases races could lead to complete > blackholes to some IPv6 destinations for minutes. In the end it seemed > pretty good reproduceable and I wonder why not many more people did > report bugs. I hope the relevant patches will land in one of the next > stable kernels. It is not always a bad configured bad firewall. ;) Yes, there are at least two things that would help - RFC4821 for hosts and SEAL for tunnels. Thanks - Fred fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > Greetings, > > Hannes
