On 14/mar/2014, at 07:08, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > On 14/03/14 00:21, "Marco Sommani" <marcosomm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> AVM is not alone in its choices: they just do what is suggested in RFC >> 6092 - "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises >> Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service". I don't >> like what they do, but maybe we should blame IETF. > > Marco > > I agree and disagree :-) > > Agreement on the fact that AVM is not the only CPE vendor doing this (and > also blaming ISP -- notably in my country 15% of broken IPv6 connectivity > = Belgium)... > > Disagreement: RFC 6092 has TWO settings: one close and one open and the > choice should be given to the end-user. As you may know, there have been > heated discussion at the IETF on this topic One can configure exceptions on Fritz!Boxes too: just go to "Internet>Permit Access>IPv6". The problem is that they just allow exceptions for individual Interface Identifiers; no way to configure a "permit all". I'm wondering how many XBOX users are able to find their Interface ID. > > -éric > >> > -- Marco Sommani Via Contessa Matilde 64C 56123 Pisa - Italia phone: +390500986728 mobile: +393487981019 fax: +390503869728 email: marcosomm...@gmail.com
