Hi Nick, > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-ops-bounces+fred.l.templin=boeing....@lists.cluenet.de > [mailto:ipv6-ops- > bounces+fred.l.templin=boeing....@lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:13 PM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> > Cc: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de > Subject: Re: DHCPv6 relay with PD > > Templin, Fred L wrote: > > Folks, for real – read AERO. It works. I apologize if that offends anyone. > > Not at all. It's just that I'm confused about why we would need to > resort to a tunneling protocol in order to make basic ipv6 functionality > work. > > Would it not be better to try to make ipv6 work without resorting to > tunnels?
Mobile clients that can change their point of attachment to the network and may be many hops away from the DHCPv6 relay are the primary use case that AERO is addressing. But, the way in which AERO manages the routing system I think applies even when tunnels aren't needed and the clients are on the same link as the relays. Thanks - Fred fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > Nick
