Hi Dan and list,
🔓Dan Wing <dw...@cisco.com> writes:
> On 15-May-2015 02:25 am, Benedikt Stockebrand <b...@stepladder-it.com> wrote:
>> [Implications of NAT64]
>
> To avoid some of that, they can go IPv6-only, including their servers
> and all peers they communicate with, then there doesn't need to be
> NAT64 for their traffic. But even IPv6-only they will need firewall
> traversal support, as firewalls by default will block unsolicited
> incoming traffic (RFC6092).
I'm not sure if I get you correctly, but: Do you mean IPv6 only, or
dual-stacked servers (so whatever a client connects with works without
translation)?
Cheers,
Benedikt
--
Benedikt Stockebrand, Stepladder IT Training+Consulting
Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/
Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects
BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/
