> > 5.3.1 Managed Address Configuration > > IMO, it doesn't make sense to talk about "implementing DHC" without > being more specific. I suspect that all of this section is about the > client part of DHC, not the server. It would be good to make this > clear. Ditto for 5.3.2.
Suggested reslution: Modify the first sentence to: An IPv6 node that does not include an implementation of the client part of DHCP .. > Stateless DHCPv6 [DHCPv6-SL], a subset of DHCPv6, can be used to > obtain configuration information. A node that uses stateless DHCP > must have obtained its IPv6 addresses through some other mechanism, > typically stateless address autoconfiguration. > > Does this even need mentioning? I.e, what are the real implications > for clients? Do they need to implement full blown dhc (the client > part)? Or do they implement some subset? (Hmm... reading the related > draft, clients implement a subset... And this document has a normative > reference to the other ID, so either this document needs to be more > explicit about what stateless DHCPv6 is, or will have to wait on the > other document.) Suggest resolution: strike the paragraph. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
