> > 11. Security Considerations > > This section seems both too detailed and not detailed enough. Too > detailed in that it talks about security issues related to some > (arbitrary?) protocols like ICMPv6, but not detailed enough in that it > is anywhere complete and doesn't mention many other protocols that > could also be included if one were to include ICMPv6. My suggestion > would be to up-level here and not talk about detailed security issues > of individual protocols. If you want to do that, point to the security > sections in other documents. But if you do this, you'll have a hard > time deciding whether to mention every document or just some. > > Does _this_ document itself introduce or raise any security issues not > covered elsewhere? That is the question this document should focus > on. The answer may be mostly no.
I am not a security expert, perhaps Jari could comment on this section. This document does not introduce any new security vulnerabilites on the Internet. However, in creating this document some of the contributors felt that there are security issues that are not covered in existing RFCs and this is what we have tried to document. Perhaps you should be more specific on what should be removed, for example. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
