> Agreed. My point was more to make the WG aware of the issues raised
> in the SEND document. The issues raised in other places (e.g. MIPv6)
> are just as important.
>
Perhaps it would be helpful if the MIP WG would come up with a draft that
collected the issues in one place. I know some of them were discussed in the
DNA BOF, but were they specifically related to RFC 2461/2 rather than being
generic for IP movement detection?
jak
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
