Additional input for your consideration. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > In other words, we found that there was consensus to deprecate AND > replace site-locals, ... Witness the situation where the chair is after the fact defining what the working group agreed to. There was nothing about 'replacement' in the question that was asked.
Coupling this with her earlier comment: > I think it should be harder to add a new feature to a specification > than to take one out. shows that, now as AD, the bar for a disambiguated local range will be higher if the pronouncement is allowed to stand, than what is necessary to fix the existing specification. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
