> > There is also the process issue on what can be added to > > a DS, given the requirements on moving from PS to DS > > (having every option interop tested and some level of > > deployment), which might stand in the way of adding > > new extensions from a PS/draft. > > You are allowed to add things that have been at PS for 6 months with > interoperability test results i.e. things that could move to DS in > their own right.
=> Excellent, thanks for the clarification. I guess this would definitely qualify the R and H bits in the RA to be included. I'll check to see if the RA interval option was ever interop tested. Hesham > > Erik > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
