> > Adding MTU negotiations to 2461bis is a non-starter IMHO. The > purpose of 2461bis is to clarify issues in the existing 2461, not > add new features. >
I agree. I don't see how brand new, complex features can be added to the specification without requiring it to recycle to proposed. You can't be draft standard without implementation reports for ALL the features. I don't believe that any new features should be added to this specification. No R bit, no peer-to-peer MTU negotiation. Nothing should be done to this specification except bug fixes. If we crack this thing open for new features our grand children will be working on it. Just my $.02 Tim Hartrick Mentat Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
