On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 03:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Keith,
So - yes, we need addresses that can be easily allocated for local use (and perhaps for other purposes also), but they should not carry with them any assumptions about the degree of locality or proximity, trustworthiness, filtering, or policy.
I agree. I think that in documenting addresses allocated for local use, we should not imply that these addresses have any particular properties, except that they are intended for local use.
even the word "local" might be too much. it is not out of the question for networks from all over the world to agree to exchange traffic using GUPIs and/or PUPIs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
