On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Barany, Pete wrote: > The rationale also fails to account for 3GPP2 networks (cdma2000). Here, > PPP (IPV6CP) is used to obtain an IPv6 address for the mobile (or the > MIPv6 CoA for the mobile). UMTS uses a PDP context instead. > > Since 3GPP2 has mandated a restriction that the /64 prefix advertised to > a mobile by a PDSN (similar to 'GGSN' if you are a UMTS-only person) be > unique/exclusive to that PPP link, then there is no need for the > suggested update #1 below. In fact, quite the contrary.
Umm.. but doesn't the access router which terminates the PPP link also have an address from that /64 prefix (e.g., ::1) -- or does it have a link-local address only? In case such an assumption is made, it should be spelled out clearly enough. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
