Hi Jari, > I think you should normatively reference only those bis > documents that are RFCs, in RFC Editor queue, in IESG review > or at least close to it. > > Otherwise it could be a long wait.
Of course. > Informative references for ongoing work are another matter. This is what I was really asking. Shall I alert the reader of the documents which are being updated? John 1H>þ°¢¹"+¢êfj)b b²Ø¿¨µú+fx¬¶¶÷z«²Û!¶Úlÿü0ÃXµú+ùYùb²Ø~â¦þ
