Note: I think you should also point to, using informational reference, to draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt, in the appropriate place in "CHANGES FROM RFC 2461" -- to give some more background to this.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On-link assumptions in 2461 considered harmful. > This issue was raised by Alain and documented in: > draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt > draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-00.txt > Also see related issue in section 2.4 of: > http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/ipv6/draft-jinchoi-ipv6-cRA-00.txt > > Suggestion: > > Remove on-link assumption from section 5.2. > This sentence was removed from section 5.2. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
