Hi, I think that in general this is actually new function, and is likely to be covered in DNA.
It may be worth talking about whether router solicitations sent to the unicast address of the router need to be delayed in the same fashion though. (since there is no chance of response implosion, if a unicast response. multicast could still have the MIN_DELAY_BETWEEN_RAS). At this time (based on discussion on DNA list) it may be useful to have an RS only transmitted to one of the routers. It is unclear how well this is supported by existing routers, or if it is intended that hosts can solicit only their favourite router. If it is already supported by routers, is it worth clarifying the capability in 2461bis. There is no mention of unicast RS in RFC2461, and no strict requirement listed for multicast. Greg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
