Hi Ralph, > I also agree that we should be more precise in our acceptance of > "implemented and interoperable". I fear that the current practice can be > (and has been) applied selectively to allow advancement of some standards > while holding back others.
I'm not sure that your point above is something that is within the IPv6 WGs scope. Perhaps this needs to be taken up with the IESG or elsewhere. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
