On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:32:26AM -0400, Ralph Droms wrote: > Your list of behaviors is a good starting point for a BCP document. As you > point out, if we know there is rough consensus in support of writing such a > doc, RFC 2462bis can proceed without explicit prescription of client > behavior. > > I remember (my memory, of course, may be faulty) that the behavior of the > client you cite from RFC 2462 was specified to avoid DoS attacks in which > rouge RAs with the M/O flags set to off would not cause hosts to stop using > DHCPv6.
So would such a document branch out to include cases like a node moving between networks when using M and/or O hints? Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
