>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 10:01:55 +0100, >>>>> Tim Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> What do others think? Is there any other opinions? > It depends where the state is :) Of course, but the important point is to avoid the possible confusion that comes from the following facts: - RFC2462 calls the protocol for the O flag "stateful" - RFC3736, which we are primarily considering as the protocol for the O flag, contains "Stateless" in its title In this sense, > For example, there is a proposal to have lifetime information for the other > configuration (non address) data. > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-venaas-dhc-lifetime-01.txt the existence of the lifetime option does not affect anything about the discussion, IMO. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
