Dan Lanciani wrote:
| It may be that this issue of assignments performed in perpetuity
| vs fixed period renewable assignments should be a matter of
| choice by the client as the time of assignment, and that charge
| applicable to this service reflect the different cost structure
| of secure maintenance of assignment records for a fixed period vs
| costs for this record maintenance to be undertaken in perpetuity.
This would appear to be a serious change in the nature of the addresses
contemplated by the draft. I think we need to discuss how to implement
the addresses as specified, not how to make them more like existing rental
space. I also suggest that these types of concerns (which are inevitable
if the existing RIRs handle the allocations) are a strong reason to consider
using a separate allocation authority.
We should hold the line on perpetuity. These things are cheap and plentiful,
so I just don't see any of the arguments against perpetuity as valid.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
